Cases 11 - 20 of 1,598
RWS Financial Group, LLC v. Ahlers & Stoll, PC et al
as 2:2024cv11167
Plaintiff:
RWS Financial Group, LLC
Defendant:
Ahlers & Stoll, PC, Pamela Ahlers and Carolyn Stoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jackson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Jackson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Davol, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rynaski v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65244
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rynaski
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May #929149 v. Minnick et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Damian Michael May #929149
Defendant:
Emily A. Minnick, Unknown Smolenski, Carolyn Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01706
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Carolyn Blake and Don Blake
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Powell
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lay v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Lisa Carolyn Lay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
PD v. Sampson et al
as 2:2024cv10894
Plaintiff:
P. D. and PD
Defendant:
James Sampson, Tamara L. Spencer, Carolyn Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
Tyler Harris
Defendant:
Shelby County, Tennessee, WellPath, LLC, Carolyn Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
