Cases 11 - 20 of 467
Currie et al v. My Fav Electronics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Paula B. Currie and Megan Finnegan-Ratliff
Defendant:
My Fav Electronics, Inc. doing business as Second Life Mac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Allen Wiley, III v. David Green, et al
as 24-5074
Plaintiff:
ALLEN WILEY, III
Defendant:
DAVID GREEN, Warden, LIEUTENANT NICHOLAS CLEVERGER, SERGEANT TYLER BAILEY and others
United States of America v. Premier Property Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currie Lee Byrd
Garnishee:
Premier Property Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Hawkins v. Caperter et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Rod Caperter, Jr., Unknown Lyhoyd, Curry Brasfield and others
Hawkins v. Caperter et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Rod Caperter, Jr., Unknown Lyhoyd, Curry Brasfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Carpenter, Jr et al
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Ron Carpenter, Jr, Lylod Curry Brasfield and Cornelius Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01305
Petitioner:
Ronald Curry
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGill et al v. Xponential Fitness LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03909
Plaintiff:
Shannon McGill, Gina Oliveira, Justin Curry and others
Defendant:
Xponential Fitness LLC, XPOF Assetco, LLC, AKT Franchise, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Odessey Curry
as 23-3839
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ODESSEY CHERRELL CURRY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
