Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Ronnie Carter v. H&M Demolition Companies, Inc., et al
as 19-1899
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, CITY OF LUDINGTON, MI and H&M DEMOLITION COMPANIES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE E. CARTER
Williams v. H&M Snow Pros Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00830
Defendant:
H&M Landscaping, Inc. and H&M Snow Pros, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pigues et al v. H & M International Transportation et al
as 2:2018cv02680
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, H & M International Transportation, Jeremy K Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Pigues and Tise Pigues
Undetermined:
Donna L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Doe et al v. Thoen et al
as 3:2017cv14008
Plaintiff:
E.V. Doe, J. P. Doe, N. C. Doe and others
Defendant:
Shirley Thoen and Port Huron Area S.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv14010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. H&M Demolition Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. Carter
Defendant:
H&M Demolition Companies, Inc., Ludington, City of, Department of Natural Resources and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rochester v. Harwell et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Defendant:
R.B. Harwell, K.F. McDonald, J. M. Childs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owners Insurance Company v. McClure et al (TV2)
as 3:2015cv00052
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Wallace McClure and H & M Builders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RevoLaze LLC v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB et al
as 1:2014cv01812
Plaintiff:
RevoLaze LLC
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB and H&M Hennes & Mauritz LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Maisano v. Modrzejewski et al
as 3:2013cv01343
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
John Modrzejewski, Corizon Health Inc., State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
