Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Spearman v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv13495
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Chad H. Williams, Osbourne, Gehoski and others
United States of America v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 2.77 Acres of Lane et al
as 3:2017cv01348
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 2.77 Acres of Land, More Or Less, and Additional Rights With Respect To A Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Overland In Montgomery County, Tennessee, TriStar Bank, Ted H. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
USA v. Troy William
as 17-3221
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TROY H. WILLIAMS
CSX Transportation Inc. v. Williams
as 3:2016cv02242
Plaintiff:
CSX Transportation Inc.
Defendant:
David H Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. USA
as 1:2016cv01559
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Troy H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
William H. Williams
Defendant:
Baptist Healthcare System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Troy William
as 15-3165
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TROY H. WILLIAMS
Occupy Defiance et al v. City of Defiance, Ohio et al
as 3:2013cv02339
Plaintiff:
Occupy Defiance , Jacob Gallman , Mara Watson and others
Defendant:
City of Defiance, Ohio, Robert Armstrong, David H Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Capital Bank Financial Corp.
as 3:2013cv00438
Plaintiff:
Joette H Williams
Defendant:
Capital Bank Financial Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taylor #198316 v. Williams et al
as 1:2012cv00281
Plaintiff:
Donald Patrick Allen Taylor #198316
Defendant:
Chad H. Williams, Steve Lacy, Scott Fleischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
