Cases 11 - 20 of 696
John Doe v. United States Probation Office, Eastern District o, et al
as 24-5314
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, LAWSON BURROW, Officer, AMBER WILSON, Officer and others
Penley v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Cody Penley
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rettig v. Bendarski et al
as 2:2024cv10298
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rettig
Defendant:
Bendarski, Thiem, Burciaga and others
Lawson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01510
Plaintiff:
Lee Lawson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wolfenbarger v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10616
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Wolfenbarger
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Bryan Morrison, Troy Chrisman and others
Mahaffey v. Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Trontez Mahaffey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prison, FMC Lexington, City of Lexington, Warden David Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lawson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
David Lawson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lawson v. SALT Dental Collective, LLC
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Brian D. Lawson
Defendant:
SALT Dental Collective, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Hazel Lawson and Terry Lawson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
