Cases 11 - 20 of 146
Leggett v. McClendon et al
as 3:2021cv00213
Defendant:
Judge McClendon and Alex Everson
Plaintiff:
William Ray Leggett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dover et al v. Yanfeng US Automotive Interior Systems I LLC et al
as 2:2020cv11643
Defendant:
John Does 1-40, Yanfeng Global Automotive Interior Systems Company Ltd. Employee Benefits Policy Committee, Yanfeng Global Automotive Interior Systems Company Ltd., Investment Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Dover, Eric Simpson and Steven Leggett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Leggett et al v. Armstrong
as 3:2020cv00183
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Leggett and Brandon Leggett
Defendant:
Robert Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott et al v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
as 2:2019cv02807
Defendant:
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Plaintiff:
John E Shannon, Jr, Benjamin Miller, Donald W Boxx and others
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Leggett v. Western Express Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00110
Defendant:
Clearance Esterday, Western Express Inc., Donna Wise and others
Plaintiff:
James Leggett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Bryant Leggett
as 19-1079
Defendant / Appellant:
BRYANT OKEFF LEGGETT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Leggett v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company
as 2:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
Josiah Leggett
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Leggett v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company
as 1:2018cv00123
Plaintiff:
Josiah Leggett
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Wallace v. Clements et al
as 1:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Wallace
Defendant:
Chris Clements, Wes Mayes, Karen Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
