Cases 11 - 20 of 282
Stooksbury v. Relient Standard Insurance (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Howard Q Stooksbury
Defendant:
Relient Standard Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Waynard WinbushIn re: Waynard Winbush
as 23-5530
Petitioner:
In re: WAYNARD Q. WINBUSH
Respondent:
SHARON N. ROSE, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Silvani, et al. v Chang, et al.
as 1:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
MARY SILVANI and Clifford Q. Cabansag
Defendant:
JOHN SILVANI, CLIFFORD CABANSAG, Charles Chang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
v. Silvani et al
as 1:2023oe00219
Plaintiff:
Mary Silvani, John Silvani and Clifford Q. Cabansag
Defendant:
Charles Chang, Stacey Davis, Pax Treatment Centers LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Emmanuel Patrick v. Sarah Schroeder, et al
as 23-1313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL PATRICK, aka Emanuel David Alfaro Patrick
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden, D. VITTALA, Assistant Deputy Warden, PHYSICAL PLANT SUPERVISOR SUNDHOLM and others
Patrick #365617 v. Schroeder et al
as 2:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Patrick #365617
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, D. Vittala, Unknown Sundholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Harpham et al
as 1:2023cv10117
Plaintiff:
Jon Q Wright and JQ Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Michael J. Harpham, Laura Shorkey, Saginaw Bay Walleye Club Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
