Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Stines v. SSA
as 5:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Plaintiff:
Scott Edward Stines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas Burrell, et al v. Concept AG, LLC, et al
as 19-6012
Defendant / Appellee:
B & B, INC., KEVIN COOPER, CONCEPT AG, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL TRUSTEE GROUP, TYRONE GRAYER, WALTER JACKSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS BURRELL
Congleton v. Stines et al
as 7:2019cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alisha Congleton
Defendant:
Mickey Stines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stine et al v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Michael Stine and Zach Payne
Defendant:
Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burrell et al v. Concept Ag. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02265
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burrell , Tyrone Grayer , Walter Jackson and others
Defendant:
Concept Ag. LLC, Agri Select LLC, Stine Seed and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Horton v. Lincoln et al
as 2:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Christopher Horton
Defendant:
Robert Lincoln, Jeff Johnson, Robert Stine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crail et al v. Elsmere Health Facilities, LP et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dorothy P. Crail , Robert W. Crail, Sr. , Megan Crail and others
Defendant:
Elsmere Health Facilities, LP , Barbara Beckley, Jessica Stines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Steven Caryer v. Dr. Stine, et al
as 16-3632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. CARYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. STINE, [UNKNOWN] DONUGHUE, GARY C. MOHR, ODRC and others
Stines v. The Bank of Harlan
as 6:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Clair Stines
Defendant:
The Bank of Harlan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Gresham #272603 et al v. Washington et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Daphne M. Johnson, Willie O. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
