Cases 21 - 30 of 808
Lopez v. Palmer et al
as 2:2024cv10802
Plaintiff:
Sotero Montellano Lopez, III
Defendant:
Robert Palmer, Jr., Board of Governors of the Federal Reseve System, US Department of Treasury and others
Lopez et al v. First Merchants Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv10647
Plaintiff:
Sotero Montellano Lopez, III and Sotero Montellano Lopez III Corp
Defendant:
First Merchants Corporation, Bryan Sparks, US Department of Treasury and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lopez v. Corby et al
as 2:2024cv10626
Plaintiff:
Antonio J. Lopez, Tony Lopez and Anthoney Lopez
Defendant:
Corby, Martinez, Smirnes and others
Fidel Sanchez-Lopez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3186
Petitioner:
FIDEL SANCHEZ-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Obden Lopez Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3176
Petitioner:
OBDEN NOE LOPEZ MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv10511
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Police Department Sterling Heights, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Sterling Heights Police Department, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Maguinuss et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Thomas
Defendant:
Evon Maguinuss, Liz Hodge, Jackie Matheny, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
