Cases 21 - 30 of 550
Day v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01150
Petitioner:
Terry Day
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe (T.W.) v. JRD Partnership et al
as 3:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (T.W.)
Defendant:
JRD Partnership doing business as Motel 6, G6 Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality Franchising, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Strong et al v. Marquette, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Tracy Strong, Tonya Strong, Robert Osborne and others
Defendant:
Marquette, County of, Jacqueline Solomon, Nicholas Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Day v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
Scott Day
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angulo v. Serendipity Day Spa, LLC
as 1:2023cv11820
Plaintiff:
Rachel Angulo
Defendant:
Serendipity Day Spa, LLC
Dooley v. Knox County et al
as 3:2023cv00265
Plaintiff:
Jerome Nchiyaleo Dooley and Jerome Nchiyako Dooley
Defendant:
Knox County, Scott G Greene, Hector Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Day Air Credit Union
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Keasia Jackson and Ke'Asia Jackson
Defendant:
Day Air Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
