Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Dawkins v. Village of Lincoln Heights et al
as 1:2013cv00542
Defendant:
Lincoln Heights, Village of, Stephanie Summerow-Dumas, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Simpson, et al. v. Dawkins
as 1:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
Marcus Simpson and Pauline Edwards
Defendant:
Henry Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawkins v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20181
Plaintiff:
Charles Dawkins
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AF Holdings LLC v. Dawkins
as 2:2012cv13436
Plaintiff:
AF Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Ray Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ruffin v. Dawkins et al
as 1:2012cv00572
Plaintiff:
Davonte Ruffin
Defendant:
Henry Dawkins and Justin Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dierig v. Lees Leisure Ind Ltd et al
as 2:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Dierig
Defendant:
Lees Leisure Ind Ltd, Lite Tent Camper, LLC and Jimmie G. Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawkins v. Cobb et al
as 3:2011cv00239
Plaintiff:
Roy O Dawkins
Defendant:
Edward Cobb and Epes Transport System, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Epes Transport System, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Roy O Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawkins v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Dawkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Six Thousand Eight Hundred Eighteen and 00/100 Dollars ($6, 818.00) In United States Currency
as 2:2011cv00367
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Six Thousand Eight Hundred Eighteen and 00/100 Dollars ($6, 818.00) In United States Currency
Claimant:
Luther Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Dawkins v. USA
as 2:2011cv00024
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terry L Dawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
