Cases 21 - 30 of 13,724
Jones v. Campbell et al
as 2:2024cv10683
Plaintiff:
Jumaane Jones and Jumaane Amunra Jones
Defendant:
Campbell, Krueger, Rombach and others
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Gillespie v. Chambers-Smith, et al.
as 1:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Alan Gillespie
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Warden Kenneth Black, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lee v. Wellpath Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lee
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, Hayes, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spencer v. Stoyk et al
as 2:2024cv11255
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Spencer
Defendant:
Stoyk, Duperron and John Doe
Woods v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2024cv02304
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Steve Woods
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. doing business as The Home Depot and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Flemister v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 2:2024cv10725
Plaintiff:
Diana Flemister
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagne Generale Des Etablissements Michelin SCA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garrett v. Allen et al.
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
Lisa Garrett
Defendant:
Cruz D. Allen, Trance M. Van Liere, Thomas Develin and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
