Cases 21 - 30 of 696
Rettig v. Bendarski et al
as 2:2024cv10299
Plaintiff:
Benjamin James Rettig
Defendant:
Bendarski, Thiem, Burciago and others
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Lawson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Laramie Lawson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hughes v. Lawson et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Martin E. Hughes
Defendant:
Ronnie Lawson, Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashe et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Victor Ashe, Phil Lawson and League of Women Voters of Tennessee
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins and Jonathan Skrmetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Kiptin et al
as 5:2023cv13007
Plaintiff:
Toran Peterson
Defendant:
Kiptin, Peeks, S. Campbell and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jaluob v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv12963
Plaintiff:
Najlaa Jaluob
Defendant:
Jackson, Kusnir, Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
