Cases 21 - 30 of 335
Luke Reed v. Joe Stewart, et al
as 23-6016
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUKE DAVISON REED
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE STEWART, Ted Lavit Law Firm and KALEN REED, Circuit 11 Judge
Stampone #713769 v. Michigan Supreme Court et al
as 1:2023cv01166
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Julie Clement, Michigan Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Rickel et al
as 2:2023cv12538
Plaintiff:
Michelle Smith
Defendant:
John M. Rickel, The Rickel law firm P.C. and Association Dues Assurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dolen Penn v. Sullivan County et al
as 2:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Dolen Penn and Melissa Dolen Penn
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Dept of Children Services in Sullivan County, Tri-Cities Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1435
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 1:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mawule Tepe
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation, Clifton L Corker, Jane Doe3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
HOP Plaintiffs v. Liblang et al
as 2:2023mc50768
Plaintiff:
HOP Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Dani K. Liblang and Liblang Law Firm
Willhite v. Arrants et al (TV1)
as 3:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Sarrah Denton Willhite
Defendant:
Timothy Arrants, Julie Myrick and Myrick Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
