Cases 21 - 30 of 1,599
Anthony Cain v. Thomas Evans, et al
as 24-5194
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CAIN, aka Jeffery Johnson
Defendant:
THOMAS EVANS, Sergeant, DANA PENNIGER, Lieutenant, JORDAN KIESTER, Lieutenant and others
Weaver v. Doerflien et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mykell Weaver
Defendant:
Lt Dean Doerflien, Sgt William Hane, P.O. Andrew Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Allen et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe Chapman
Defendant:
Donald Allen, FNU Boyd, Joshua Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Marcus Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morris v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael David Morris
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morris v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Phillip Morris
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Management Solutions Holdings, LLC et al v. City of Southfield
as 2:2024cv10279
Plaintiff:
Management Solutions Holdings, LLC, Shannon Steel and Aaron Morris
Defendant:
Southfield, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Allen v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Dale Allen
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IRS Commissioner and Jonathan M. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
