Cases 21 - 30 of 140
Scott v. Blackwelder et al
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott, Carman Brown and Frankie Brown
Defendant:
Sheriff Murry Blackwelder, Owen Blackwelder, Tammy McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Metcalf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Eli Metcalf
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Metcalf #09198-040 v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00577
Petitioner:
RESTRICTED FILER Bradford Metcalf #09198-040
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv12242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leslie Metcalfe v. Jeremy Howard
as 22-1378
Petitioner / Appellant:
LESLIE CECILIA METCALFE
Respondent / Appellee:
JEREMY HOWARD, Warden
Bradford MetcalfIn re: Bradford Metcalf
as 22-1334
Petitioner:
In re: BRADFORD METCALF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robert Johnson v. Drew Nelson, et al
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DREW NELSON, Ohio Highway Patrol, RICHLAND COUNTY JAIL, JUDGE JERRY E. AULT and others
Bailey v. Ford Motor Company (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00091
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
James Bailey, Mary Mcknatt, Lana Rymer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Metcalf v. Atkins et al
as 2:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Metcalf
Defendant:
Atkins, Bert C. Boyd, Gregg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raytheon Company v. Ahtna Support and Training Services, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00239
Defendant:
David L. Metcalf, Ahtna Netiye', LLC, Ahtna Support and Training Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
