Cases 21 - 30 of 176
Smith v. Barberville Police Department et al
as 6:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ellis Smith
Defendant:
Barberville Police Department, Chase Henson and Karl Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Barberville Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Ellis Smith
Defendant:
Barberville Police Department, Chase Henson and Karl Middleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Middleton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
RONALD MIDDLETON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dilworth v. Diekevers et al
as 1:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Latraveus Levon Dilworth
Defendant:
Austin Diekevers, Derek Hall, Jeffrey Dionne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Alex Pedrin v. T. Middleton, et al
as 21-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEX JOSEPH PEDRIN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER T. MIDDLETON, USP-McCreary, OFFICER DAULTON, USP-McCreary, WARDEN CHRISTOPHER GOMEZ, USP-McCreary and others
Middleton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04627
Plaintiff:
JABARI MIDDLETON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stack Construction Technologies, Inc. v. Middleton
as 1:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Stack Construction Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Hannah Middleton and 1build, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Middleton et al v. United Van Lines, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Armstrong Relocation CO. Inc., James Richardson and United Van Lines, LLC
Plaintiff:
Phillip Parks, Steven Villalobo and John Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Middleton
as 2:2021cv00071
Respondent:
John C. Middleton
Petitioner:
Durrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
