Cases 21 - 30 of 330
Gibson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gibson, Willard Sowards, Judy Sowards and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Mine Safety Appliances Company, LLC, American Optical Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Lopez et al v. Mastronardi Produce-USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lopez, Oscar Carlos Lopez Ramirez and Ramona Reyes Saucedo
Defendant:
Mastronardi Produce-USA, Inc. and Maroa Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
USA v. George Messer
as 22-5420
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GEORGE OSCAR MESSER
Smith et al v. OPACHS, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02263
Plaintiff:
Kadryn Smith and Joseph Dabney
Defendant:
OPACHS, LLC and Oscar Pruitt
USA v. Oscar Goodwin, Jr.
as 22-5327
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
OSCAR GOODWIN, JR.
Smith v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Oscar Smith
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee, Herbert Slatery, Lisa Helton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Li
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Oscar Smith
Defendant:
Dr. Feng Li
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Golden et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ashly Carmelle Dorsainville, Fridelyne Maisoneuve and others
Defendant:
Scott Golden, Jennifer Little, Pat Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01721
Plaintiff:
OSCAR JAMES BELL
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oscar Morales-Ortiz, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3207
Petitioner:
OSCAR MIGUEL MORALES-ORTIZ, ADRIANITA ELIZABETH GALDAMES-DEL VALLE, ESVIN GALDAMES-DEL VALLE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
