Cases 31 - 40 of 781
Barnes v. Kentucky State Police Official Office et al
as 5:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Terquise Barnes
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Official Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Fayette County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray Young
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Cevin York, Tommy Maynard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright et al v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Wright, Jr. and Vondale Eugene Solomon
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Cevin York, Brandon Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) INC. et al
as 4:2023cv12897
Plaintiff:
Robert Barnes
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) INC., Renaissance Center Management Company, General Motors, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barnes v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03816
Plaintiff:
Deanna Barnes
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Cordero Barnes
as 23-1974
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CORDERO EUGENE BARNES
USA v. Cordero Barnes
as 23-1975
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CORDERO EUGENE BARNES
Corps v. County of Ogemaw, Michigan et al
as 1:2023cv12724
Plaintiff:
Michael Corps
Defendant:
Ogemaw, County of, Brian Osier, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Ettienne v. Lopez et al
as 1:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ettienne
Defendant:
Christian Lopez, Kevin York, Brandon Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Barnes v. Misty Mackey
as 23-3822
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID BARNES
Respondent / Appellee:
MISTY MACKEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
