Cases 31 - 40 of 123
Nolan v. Detroit Edison Company et al
as 2:2018cv13359
Defendant:
DTE Energy Company Retirement Plan, DTE Energy Benefit Plan Administration Committee, Michael S Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie D Nolan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Savoie et al v. East Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2018cv01180
Defendant:
matthew swab, Jeff Murphy, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Paige Louise Hooper and Tiffany Louise Savoie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. City of East Lansing et al
as 2:2018cv13258
Defendant:
Tiffany Savoi and City of East Lansing
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hooper et al v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
as 1:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Shermel J. Hooper and Joe Lawrence Hooper
Defendant:
Grand Trunk Western Railroad Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Clements et al
as 1:2017cv01218
Plaintiff:
Larry J. Wallace
Defendant:
Chris Clements, Wes Mayes, Karen Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Green v. William (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Harry Louis Green
Defendant:
Lara William, BB & T Bank, Region Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Peterson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02457
Plaintiff:
Valencia Peterson and Lakesha Hooper
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
Sparks v. Hooper et al
as 2:2017cv00224
Plaintiff:
William Sparks
Defendant:
Hooper, Baliff 1, Baliff 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Cassell et al v. Licking County Memorial Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Charles Michael Cassell, III, Randi Wagner and Angela Barrett
Defendant:
Licking County Memorial Hospital, Hooper, Ranic Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
