Cases 31 - 40 of 13,780
Strobl et al v. Croft et al
as 1:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Stacy Strobl and Brian Harding
Defendant:
Paul Croft, Jonathan Frost, Rhino Onward International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Kevin Giles v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Sheriff, KAY [UNKNOWN], Nurse, LIZ [UNKNOWN], Nurse and others
Ledesma v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2024cv11432
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ledesma
Defendant:
Wayne, County of, Clark, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sayers v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Ricky Sayers
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C R Bard Inc, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe (WDM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
John Doe (WDM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Morris et al v. Medtronic Minimed, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Morris, Kevin Lane Morris, Timothy Ethan Morris and others
Defendant:
Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Minimed Distribution Corp., Medtronic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
