Cases 31 - 40 of 155
Russell v. American Red Cross - Louisville Area Chapter et al
as 3:2018cv00785
Defendant:
John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 2, American Red Cross - Louisville Area Chapter and others
Plaintiff:
Shawana Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. John Doe Corporation #1
as 5:2018cv13303
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation #1, John Doe Corporation #2 and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Plaintiff:
Cedric Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pyrett v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv02330
Plaintiff:
Roberta Pyrett
Defendant:
John Doe #1-2, WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pointer v. Morh et al
as 2:2018cv00653
Defendant:
Ms. Workman, Mr. Heard, Mr. Emmens and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wayne Pointer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gold Star Energy LLC v. Dunlap et al
as 2:2018cv00442
Defendant:
D'Andre Davis, LifeEnergy, LLC, Timothy Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Gold Star Energy LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Hairston v. Maria et al
as 2:2018cv00378
Plaintiff:
Rico I. Hairston
Defendant:
Maria, Brown, Grimm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson, III v. Zeolla et al
as 2:2018cv10481
Plaintiff:
Charles Earl Watson, III
Defendant:
W. Zeolla , C. Bush, Jane Doe Grabber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez Ortiz v. Jefferson County, Tennessee (PLR2)
as 3:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Luis Rafael Rodriguez Ortiz
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Tennessee , Eddie Mafnas, Karen Clevenger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
