Cases 31 - 40 of 209
David Streety v. Daniel Grand, et al
as 20-2277
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF CONTRARAS, SARGENT MORAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of M.D.O.C. State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID STREETY
Moran, Personal Representative of the Estate of Frankie Edith Kerouac Parker v. Edie Parker, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv12717
Defendant:
Edie Parker, LLC, Brett Heyman and Edie Parker Accessories, LLC
Plaintiff:
Timothy Moran, Personal Representative of the Estate of Frankie Edith Kerouac Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woody v. Kelley et al
as 1:2020cv01252
Defendant:
Ben Burnett, Jimmy Gray, Union City Police Department, Union City, TN and others
Plaintiff:
Cornilios Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adenis Prieto Refunjol, et al v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 20-3757
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS VERGARA PATINO, OSMAN FAGHI HAJI, JORGE SALAS-MARIN and others
Respondent:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and REBECCA ADDUCCI, in her official capacity as Detroit District Director of US Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Sinclair v. Moran Foods, LLC
as 1:2019cv02569
Plaintiff:
Brittany Sinclair
Defendant:
Moran Foods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Streety #191233 v. Grand et al
as 2:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Sarah Schroeder, Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Perry and others
Plaintiff:
David Streety #191233
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. USA
as 2:2020cv00113
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brandon Moran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jose Moran-Quintanilla v. William Barr
as 20-3268
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
JOSE MORAN-QUINTANILLA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
