Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Skidmore v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00649
Plaintiff:
Gloria Skidmore
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, et al
as 2:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio,, Real Property Known and Numbered as 1501 thomas Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, Real Property Known and Numbered as 300 Cypress Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Skidmore v. Alred et al
as 6:2009cv00215
Petitioner:
Clifford Skidmore
Respondent:
Russell Alred and Linda West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skidmore v. Henley et al.
as 6:2008cv00321
Petitioner:
Clifford Skidmore
Respondent:
James Earl Henley and Russell Alred
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Skidmore v. Baxter International, Inc et al
as 1:2008hc60039
Plaintiff:
Betty Skidmore
Defendant:
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter Healthcare Corp., Baxter Healthcare Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv11343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Skidmore v. Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust et al.
as 1:2008cv00045
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Skidmore and Joseph Lee Skidmore
Defendant:
Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Trust and Lorrie Ann Andrews
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
