Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 143
Underwood #289985 v. Binkley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00501
Defendant: Unknown Binkley and Unknown Cope
Plaintiff: Rasheed Underwood #289985
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aldridge et al v. Regions Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00082
Plaintiff: Everett Mills, Rick Eldridge, Louis Frank Knight and others
Defendant: Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Kendrick v. Erdos et al
as 2:2021cv00983
Defendant: Institutional Insp Linnea Mahlman, Health Care Admin Goodwin, Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Mark Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00010
Defendant: Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carolyn Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00013
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Earl Anderson v. John Hairabedian, et al
as 20-4177
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL BRANDEL, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Corrections Counselor-ToCI, MARSHAL KLAVINGER, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Correctional Counselor, ROBERT COPELY, individually and in his/her official capacity as Lieutenant Supervisor-ToCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: EARL ANDERSON
Cope et al v. Equifax et al
as 3:2020cv00689
Defendant: Fox Collections, Equifax, Transunion and others
Plaintiff: Denise Cope and Max Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randall CopeIn re: Randall Cope
as 20-5695
Petitioner: In re: RANDALL E. COPE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Terry Cope
as 20-5658
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: In re: TERRY WAYNE COPE
OJ Commerce LLC v. Noco Company
as 1:2020cv01198
Defendant: Noco Company
Not Classified By Court: Carol S. Cope
Plaintiff: OJ Commerce LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?