Cases 31 - 40 of 1,362
Carr v. Google Inc., a Delaware Corporation
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
RaSaon Carr
Defendant:
Google Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Shocked v. YouTube (Google, Inc.)
as 1:2023mc00186
Cause Of Action: M 18-304 Administrative Subpoena Proceedings
Nadia Metroka v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 23-2004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NADIA M. METROKA
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, LOWER MORELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND/OR AGENCY DEPARTMENT, KELLY E. HEIST, INDIVDUALLY AND AS OFFICER/AGENT FOR LOWER MORELAND TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT AND/OR AGENCY DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Haocheng v. YouTube Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Qian Haocheng and Haocheng Qian
Defendant:
YouTube Inc., Google Inc. and Google Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Derrick Smith v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-1197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Derrick Smith v. Google, LLC, et al
as 23-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, LLC, GOOGLE, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION and others
Inform Inc. v. Google LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Inform Inc.
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Inc,, Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Komatsu v. United States of America
as 23-95
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
United States of America, Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc., Court Security Officer Laptop and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
