Cases 41 - 50 of 185
Seanderyl Crawford v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 21-2991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEANDERYL CRAWFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Castanon v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv11942
Plaintiff:
Matthew Castanon
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Robert Rankin and General Teamsters Local Union No. 406
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
gobah v. City of Hamtramck et al
as 2:2021cv11828
Plaintiff:
joshua gobah
Defendant:
City of Hamtramck, Brian Thome, Justin Rankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirn et al v. Health System et al
as 2:2021cv12078
Plaintiff:
Katie Kirn, Allison Sleezer, Angela Carr and others
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, Wright Lassiter III, Robert G Riney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankin v. Berrien, County of
as 1:2021cv00538
Plaintiff:
James R. Rankin
Defendant:
Berrien, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Sutherlin et al
as 1:2021cv11609
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Sutherlin, Melviner Bailey and Romona Rankin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Rankin v. 84 Lumber Company, Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
Lockhart Rankin, Jr.
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Limited Partnership and 84 Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Pope v. Bradley County Government et al (TV2)
as 1:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Alexis Z Pope
Defendant:
Bradley County Government, QCHC of Tennessee, Inc., Eric Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
