Cases 41 - 50 of 6,860
Dominick Jones v. Linsia, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK MAURICE JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINSIA, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUNWIN, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAKE, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity and others
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Dixie Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02288
Plaintiff:
Justin Lavell Jones
Defendant:
Dixie Transport, Inc. and Ricky Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Watanabe v. Jones Day et al.
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Tetsunori Watanabe
Defendant:
Jones Day and Yuichiro Mori
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hickey v. Stump et al
as 1:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Kainte Hickey
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Stump, Correctional Officer Nelson, Correctional Officer Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Les Paul Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Wyoming, City of, Unknown Party #1 and Anastasia Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Hood et al
as 2:2024cv11164
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Jones
Defendant:
Charles Overton Hood, Lasalle Bank and Samuel Jackson
Amir Jones v. Romeo Management Group, LLC dba PUFF Cannabis Company
as 2:2024cv11159
Plaintiff:
Amir Jones
Defendant:
Romeo Management Group, LLC Doing business as PUFF Cannabis Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lawson et al v. Hargett et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lawson, Gabe Hart, Victor Ashe and others
Defendant:
Tre Hargett, Mark Goins, Steven R. Finney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
