Cases 41 - 50 of 280
Zimmermann v. City of Newton Falls
as 2:2022cv02140
Plaintiff:
Adam Zimmermann
Defendant:
City of Newton Falls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zimmermann v. City of Newton Falls
as 4:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Adam Zimmerman and Adam Zimmermann
Defendant:
City of Newton Falls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Robert Newton
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Clervrain et al v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Niva Guerrier, Woodny Lormil and others
Defendant:
Raul L. Ortiz, AnnMarie Highsmith, Benjamine Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cooperrider et al v. Beshear et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cooperrider and Deans Diner, LLC doing business as Brewed
Defendant:
Andrew Beshear, Ray Perry, Maggie Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jerry Anderson, II v. Candace Newton
as 22-1027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY ANDERSON, II
Defendant / Appellee:
CANDACE M. NEWTON, Assistant Resident Unit Manager
Evans v. City of Newton Falls, Ohio, et al.
as 4:2021cv02421
Plaintiff:
Matthew Evans
Defendant:
City of Newton Falls, Ohio and Pamela S. Priddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adrio v. Bibelhauser et al
as 3:2021cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brayden C. Adrio
Defendant:
Mark Bibelhauser, Eric Lewis, Jeffrey Nipp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Richardson-Newton v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05638
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Richardson-Newton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
