Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Boone #501976 v. MacLaren et al
as 2:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Boone #501976
Defendant:
Duncan MacLaren, S. Lewis, Shawn McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nice v. Velez et al
as 1:2016cv02405
Defendant:
Velez, John and Jane Does 1-3, John and Jane Does 11-13 and others
Plaintiff:
Nice and Kayla Nice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sproles v. Aramark Correctional Service
as 2:2016cv13327
Plaintiff:
Katrina Sproles
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Service
McDowell v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 2:2016cv11004
Plaintiff:
John K. McDowell
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDowell v. County of Oakland et al
as 2:2015cv13905
Plaintiff:
John K McDowell
Defendant:
Oakland, County of , Michael J. Bouchard , James Potocki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor #225263 v. Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00927
Plaintiff:
Iatonda Taylor #225263
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Inc., Kenneth McKee, Brian Schefer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boles #156632 v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00721
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Kelly Murphy, Unknown McConkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasely et al v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2015cv00374
Defendant:
Kent, County of , Lawrence A. Stelma , Aramark Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Rodell Beasely, Jr. , Brandon Davis , Dwayne Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brewster v. Aramark Correctional Services
as 2:2014cv00273
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Brewster
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services
Movant:
Karl C. Wetherby, Joseph Rickard and Jonathan E. Kiste
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
