Cases 41 - 50 of 98
Gilmore v. Ormond et al
as 6:2016cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tyganda Gilmore
Defendant:
J. Ray Ormond, Baker, Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chambers v. Long et al
as 5:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
Long, Mullins, Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Parma City School District Board of Education et al
as 1:2016cv02159
Plaintiff:
Chad Coffman
Defendant:
Parma City School District Board of Education , Carl H. Hilling , Cassandra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins Oil Company, LLC v. Equilon Enterprises LLC et al (JRG1)
as 3:2016cv00417
Plaintiff:
Hoskins Oil Company, LLC
Defendant:
Equilon Enterprises LLC, Motiva Enterprises LLC, Coffman Oil Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801
Steven Coffman v. 435 Redding, LLC, et al
as 16-5803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN COFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
435 REDDING, LLC, ISAAC COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, INC., PAUL RAY SMITH and others
Mathias et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2016cv01091
Plaintiff:
Barry D. Mathias, Timothy G. Coffman, Richard L. Casey, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Paul Thomas, David Saffell and Tim Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Thomas et al
as 1:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
Timothy G. Coffman
Defendant:
Paul Thomas, David Saffell and Tom Witherspoon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman v. Colvin et al
as 1:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
Sharon A. Coffman
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin, United States Attorney General and United States Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coffman v. 435 Redding, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00220
Plaintiff:
Steven Coffman
Defendant:
435 Redding, LLC , Isaac Commercial Properties, Inc. , Paul Ray Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mathis v. Marchum et al
as 6:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Errick Devon Mathis
Defendant:
Marchum, Doyle, Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
