Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv00284
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Baker #182416
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Prison Health Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kearney v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00021
Plaintiff:
Kelly Kearney
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv10230
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Prison Health Services, Incorporated and others
Porter v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2012cv00829
Plaintiff:
Kerry Porter
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Rodney Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kirkland v. Keeling et al
as 2:2012cv15275
Plaintiff:
George Kirkland
Defendant:
Marvin Keeling, John Kearney and Thomas Birkett
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
Hynes #209660 v. Kocka et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Hynes #209660
Defendant:
Joshua Kocka, Marvin Keeling, Jeanna Bitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Engle et al
as 3:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amber R. Engle and Justin Lee Kearney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Burton v. Parks et al
as 2:2011cv14768
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Burton
Defendant:
J Parks, Tiffany H Cannefax, John R. Kearney and others
Kearney v. Sharma et al
as 5:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Mark Edward Kearney
Defendant:
Varun Sharma and JPC Equestrian Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
