Cases 41 - 50 of 560
Frazier v. Tikisor et al
as 2:2023cv10338
Plaintiff:
Alvin Dwayne Frazier
Defendant:
Tikisor, Eric Mattson, Richard Russell and others
Kipkoech v. US Department of Justice
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Job R. Kipkoech
Defendant:
US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Houston et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv13036
Plaintiff:
Sean Houston, Romaine Kristini Davenport Trust and Sean Houston [E-filer]
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fedorova v. Foley et al
as 1:2022cv00991
Defendant:
Covius Document Services, LLC, Nationwide Title Clearing, LLC, William P. Foley, II and others
Plaintiff:
Elena Fedorova
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01458
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Lenin Morel v. Kevin Pearce, et al
as 22-5913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENIN MOREL
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN PEARCE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NATHAN TUSSEY and others
Lenin Morel v. Kevin Pearce, et al
as 22-5878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENIN MOREL
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT KEVIN PEARCE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JAMES ADAMS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NATHAN TUSSEY and others
Michael Landingham v. Department Of Justice
as 22-3968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LANDINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parker v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 0:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ruffin Parker
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
