Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 168
United States Marshal Service
as 2:2018mc51376
Dominguez v. United States Marshals et al
as 1:2018cv01043
Petitioner: Vicente Dominguez
Respondent: Bob Mendham and United States Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ibrihim v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv02429
Petitioner: Siraj Ibrihim
Respondent: Jackson, A.W. Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crain v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2018cv02360
Petitioner: Robert Crain
Respondent: AW Bradshaw, CCA/Core Logic and United States Marshals' Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel v. United States Marshal
as 1:2018cv00097
Plaintiff: Thaddeus D Daniel
Defendant: United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pierson v. Grayson County Detention Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00068
Plaintiff: Devan Lamont Pierson
Defendant: Grayson County Detention Center, Unknown Nurse "A, Unknown Nurse "I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Greene et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00884
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: Jerry Greene, Deputy Johnson, Deputy Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pilot v. Johnson et al
as 5:2018cv11097
Plaintiff: Michael Charles Pilot
Defendant: Ruth Johnson, Charles G Goedert, Hazel Park, City of and others
Palermo v. United States Marshals et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00246
Plaintiff: Robert Palermo
Defendant: United States Marshals, United States of America and Paul J. Vacca, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sapp v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv13691
Plaintiff: Lamount M. Sapp
Defendant: United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?