Cases 41 - 50 of 964
Bond Pharmacy, Inc v. Anthem Health plan of Virginia, Inc
as 2:2023mc51368
Plaintiff:
Bond Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Infusion Solutions and Bond Pharmacy, Inc Doing business as Advanced Infusion Solutions
Defendant:
Anthem Health plan of Virginia, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield and Anthem Health plan of Virginia, Inc Doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Puckett,et al v. Jabbar, et al
as 1:2023cv01143
Defendant:
National Basketball Association, Ain Jeem, Inc., Chris Stavro and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Puckett and Marcella Puckett
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Watson v. Penske Logistics LLC
as 2:2023cv11579
Plaintiff:
Virginia Watson
Defendant:
Penske Logistics LLC and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jane Doe 1, et al v. William Thornbury, Jr., et al
as 23-5609
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN MINOR DOE 1, by and through his next friend, Jane Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. THORNBURY, JR., MD, in his official capacity as the President of the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, et al.
Intervenor:
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL DANIEL CAMERON
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALASKA and others
L. W., et al v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al
as 23-5600
Plaintiff / Appellee:
L. W., by and through her parents and next friends, Samantha Williams and Brian Williams, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, BRIAN WILLIAMS and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, in his official capacity as the Tennessee Attorney General and Reporter, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, RALPH ALVARADO, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Health and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA FIRST LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Robert Greer, et al v. Carol Hagen, et al
as 23-5589
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GREER, Individually, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JEFFREY RIEMER, Individually, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JANE BARKER, Individually, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STRANGE HONEY FARM, LLC, a domestic Limited Liability Company, GARY STRANGE, Owner and Member, FONDA STRANGE, Owner and Member and others
Defendant:
CAROL HAGEN, dba Tennessee Artisan Honey
Cenneca Harmon v. Matthew Makepeace, et al
as 23-1522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENNECA DARRYL HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW WILLIAM MAKEPEACE, Wayne County Prosecutor, JOHN DOE, Detroit Police Officers, several unknown, ROBERTA C. ARCHER, 36th District Court Judge and others
Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 132 Pension Fund et al v. Aster Oilfield Services, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01820
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 132 Pension Fund, Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 132 Health and Welfare Fund, Trustees of the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 132 Annuity and Savings Fund and others
Defendant:
Aster Oilfield Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Doe 1 et al v. Thornbury et al
as 3:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Minor Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
William C. Thornbury, Jr., Audria Denker and Eric Friedlander
Intervenor Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Pediatric Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
