Cases 51 - 60 of 506
Hale v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 2:2022cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hale
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hale v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lewis Hale, Jr.
Defendant:
Roger Chadswick Johnson, Charlie Riffenberry, Sherry Sheldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hales v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01090
Not Classified By Court:
Harry Johnson
Plaintiff:
Brian Hales
Defendant:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Ronny Walker v. Amy Robey, et al
as 22-5401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNY DEVIOD WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMY ROBEY, COLIN H. LINDSAY and DAVID J. HALE
Miller v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10934
Plaintiff:
Cordelia Miller
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Dennis Hale, Jesse Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brown v. Mahlman et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Michael DeAndre Brown
Defendant:
Linnea Mahlman, James Whitman, Roger Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Delano Hale v. Tim Shoop
as 22-3265
Petitioner / Appellant:
DELANO HALE
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Hale v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2022cv10580
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Hale
Defendant:
Michael Bouchard, Well Path Health Care, Craig Diamond and others
Robert Johnson v. Drew Nelson, et al
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER DREW NELSON, Ohio Highway Patrol, RICHLAND COUNTY JAIL, JUDGE JERRY E. AULT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
