Cases 51 - 60 of 2,385
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
James v. Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
King Allah James
Respondent:
Hamilton County Jail and Detention Center and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
King v. USA
as 1:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Garrian King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Warren King
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant:
Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Anthony KingIn re: Anthony King
as 24-5226
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY W. KING
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Reilly #203296 v. King et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
James C. Reilly #203296 and Jamie Reilly #203296
Defendant:
Chris King, Bobbie Smith, Thomas Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price #362584 v. Carson City Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Robert Price #362584
Defendant:
Carson City Correctional Facility, Unknown Eeardsman, Unknown Nesbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finnell v. DeWine et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Kyle Finnell
Defendant:
Govern Mike DeWine, Lt. Jon Husted, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
