Cases 51 - 60 of 379
Schmidt Industries, Incorporated et al v. The Huntington National Bank
as 1:2022cv10412
Plaintiff:
Schmidt Industries, Incorporated and David Alan Schmidt
Defendant:
The Huntington National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Stamper v. Carter County, KY et al
as 0:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Angela Schmidt Stamper
Defendant:
Carter County, KY, Jeff May and Joshua Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nettles #271812 v. Schmidt
as 1:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Macking Nettles #271812, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmidt v. Fischer et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Defendant:
Brianna Fischer, Brianna Johnson, Tea Shop Productions and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Coleman v. Corizon et al
as 5:2021cv13061
Plaintiff:
Raynard D. Coleman
Defendant:
Corizon, Sharon R. Draveling, Paula E. Buske and others
Eagan et al v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv02348
Plaintiff:
John Eagan, II, Enyiazubuike Ehiemere, Mark Farrell and others
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mockeridge et al v. Harvey et al
as 1:2021cv12896
Plaintiff:
Michael J Mockeridge and Susan J Mockeridge
Defendant:
Harry Harvey, Alcona, County of, Carolyn Brummund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Dave Dennis Inc., et al.
as 3:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
Saylor R White
Defendant:
Dave Dennis Inc, Emily Augspurger, Beavercreek Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04771
Plaintiff:
Robert Schmidt
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00501
Plaintiff:
Christopher Schmidt
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
