Cases 61 - 70 of 8,190
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant:
JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
McCown v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (JRG1)
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mark McCown
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelby v. Tommy et al
as 2:2024cv11031
Plaintiff:
Alvonte Terrell Shelby
Defendant:
Tommy, Lee, Mark and others
Shelby v. Tommy et al
as 2:2024cv11032
Plaintiff:
Alvonte Terrell Shelby
Defendant:
Tommy, Lee, Dewight Valter and others
Robert Annabel, II v. Sherman Campbell, et al
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, DAVID MESSER, CHRISTINA BATES and others
Bredow v. Le et al
as 4:2024cv10979
Plaintiff:
Mark Wade Bredow
Defendant:
Le, Lindell, Shawn and others
Barry et al v. Newaygo, County of, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
William Barry, Mark Booher, Tom Burkholder and others
Defendant:
Heemstra Enterprises, LLC, Newaygo, County of, Jason O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
