Cases 61 - 70 of 7,044
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sprague v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Sprague
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mark Hill v. Jennifer Pell, et al
as 24-3268
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY HILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER PELL, SCOTT CRAWFORD, BRITTANY N. HAMM and others
Harding v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott Harding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Deas v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Deandrae Deas
Defendant:
Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kenneth Atkerson, Jeramie Waak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur v. UNUM Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Scott Matthew Arthur
Defendant:
UNUM Insurance Company of America, Blue Cross Blue Sheild of Michigan d/b/a BCBSM and Garber Management Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Seain Hull v. David Yost, et al
as 24-3257
Plaintiff:
SEAIN C. HULL
Defendant:
DAVID YOST, MATTHEW E. CRALL, SCOTT KENT and others
Scott v. Eller
as 4:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Malik Scott
Respondent:
Brian Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
