Cases 61 - 70 of 348
Weber v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04319
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rick Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weber v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv04276
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
David Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Radspieler v. Otsego, City of et al
as 1:2020cv00777
Defendant:
Brandon Weber, Gordon Konkle, City of Otsego Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Radspieler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Houthoofd, et al v. Tuscola Cnty, MI Rd Comm, et al
as 20-1678
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE MATUSZAK, GARY PARSELL, DAVID KENNARD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRA MALLAIS, TERRY LEE HOUTHOOFD, WENDY HOUTHOOFD and others
Weber v. Louisville Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department and Carrollton Police Department
Plaintiff:
Gary Dewayne Weber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Brian Schwab v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 20-1531
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH SCHWAB
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY #1, ROB STEELE, Special Activities, UNKNOWN DEVRIES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Schwab v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2020cv00290
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Unknown Weber, Unknown Fliwenta and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Schwab
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tedders et al v. Hawks et al
as 1:2020cv00251
Defendant:
Peter Chiaravalli, Timothy Schmakel, Irene Tseng and others
Plaintiff:
American Academy of Implant Dentistry and Pierre J. Tedders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landmark Infrastructure Operating Company LLC v. Spagnuolo-Weber
as 2:2020cv10436
Plaintiff:
Landmark Infrastructure Operating Company LLC
Defendant:
Laura Spagnuolo-Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
