Cases 71 - 80 of 624
Kennedy v. Marten Transport, Ltd.
as 5:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Vickie Kennedy
Defendant:
Marten Transport, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cosgrove v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Nancy I. Cosgrove (formerly Kennedy), Nancy I. Cosgrove and Nancy Kennedy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (RSI)
USA v. Steven Kennedy
as 22-3258
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN M. KENNEDY
Pavarthi, LLC et al v. City of Toledo, Ohio et al
as 3:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Pavarthi, LLC, Benjamin Randall and Grenwick Property Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
City of Toledo, Ohio, Dennis Kennedy and Cristy Cordell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kennedy, Sr. v. State Farm Insurance Company
as 4:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Cornell Kennedy, Sr.
Defendant:
State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Robert Kennedy v. Michael Burgess
as 22-1158
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL KENNEDY
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Kennedy v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Julia Kennedy
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robert Kennedy v. Michael Burgess
as 22-1101
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL KENNEDY
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Gricelda Morales-Morales, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3134
Petitioner:
GRICELDA FLORIDALMA MORALES-MORALES and HALSSIN KENNEDY LOPEZ-MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Streeter Jr. v. Macomb County et al
as 2:2022cv10287
Plaintiff:
Louis Streeter Jr.
Defendant:
Macomb County, Shelby Township, Dylan Najjar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
