Cases 71 - 80 of 237
Womack v. Przybylo et al
as 3:2018cv13008
Plaintiff:
Demond Womack
Defendant:
Larry Cobb, Benjamin Sonstrom, David Skeans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood et al v. Nolan Enterprises Inc.
as 2:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
Irina Voronina, Sara Underwood, Rachel Koren and others
Defendant:
Nolan Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Centerfold Club and Nolan Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Underwood et al v. Nolan Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Centerfold Club
as 1:2018cv00636
Plaintiff:
Irina Voronina, Sara Underwood and Rachel Koren
Defendant:
Nolan Enterprises Inc. d/b/a Centerfold Club and Nolan Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nolan #424721 v. Braman
as 2:2018cv00113
Respondent:
Melinda Braman
Petitioner:
Mark Nolan #424721
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burfitt v. Erving et al
as 1:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Burfitt, II
Defendant:
M. Erving, M. Esaum, R. Buroughton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P, et al
as 1:2018op45061
Plaintiff:
County of Nolan, TX
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teschenborf v. RIIS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv13967
Plaintiff:
Ann Teschenborf and Ann Teschendorf
Defendant:
RIIS, LLC and Godfrey Nolan
Acosta v. Big G Express, Inc. et al (TV3)
as 4:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Big G Express, Inc., Big G Express Employee Stock Ownership Plan, David A. Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
De Angelis v. Nolan Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00926
Plaintiff:
Stephanie De Angelis
Defendant:
Nolan Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company et al
as 3:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company, Corizon, LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
