Cases 71 - 80 of 418
Wilson #258602 v. Marburg et al
as 1:2022cv00481
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Edmund Wilson #258602
Defendant:
Unknown Marburg, B. Carl, K. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr, Warden Civile, Director of NCR FBOP Barb Von Blanckness and others
Defendant:
USP McCreary, AI Unit Manager Clark, Counselor Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Sanders #305405 v. Chapman et al
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405
Defendant:
Jaimie Chapman, Heidi Dresenga, Unknown West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Juan Hernandez-Marroquin
as 22-3341
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JUAN CARLOS HERNANDEZ-MARROQUIN, aka Juan Carlos Miguel Ramirez
Ramirez et al v. FCA US LLC
as 4:2022cv10734
Plaintiff:
Elias Ramirez, Michelle Tinio Ramirez and Javin T. Olson
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
USA v. Enrique Ramirez
as 22-5191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ENRIQUE RAMIREZ
Fermina Teletor-Ramirez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3156
Petitioner:
FERMINA TELETOR-RAMIREZ and ANTONY DANIEL TOJ-TELETOR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Conseen-Ramirez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Kim Conseen-Ramirez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mehler v. Ferris State University et al
as 1:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Barry Mehler
Defendant:
Ferris State University, David L. Eisler, Randy Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
