Cases 71 - 80 of 117
Davis v. United States Marshal Service
as 3:2013cv00399
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Plaintiff:
Annette Howser Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dunn v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2012cv00773
Plaintiff:
Ronald Edward Dunn
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Mike Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Poole v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv14917
Plaintiff:
Jamar Poole
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshal Service, United States District Court Eastern District of Michigan and others
Freeman Davis v. United States Marshal Service, et al
as 12-5750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREEMAN DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and UNKNOWN DEPUTY U.S. MARSHALS
Poole v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2012cv12741
Plaintiff:
Jamar Anthony Poole
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, United States District Court, Eastern District of Michigan and others
Dicenso v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2012cv01113
Petitioner:
John D. Dicenso
Respondent:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Clark v. Howard et al
as 6:2012cv00032
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clark
Defendant:
Laura Howard, J. Pittman, United States Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. United States Department of Justice
as 3:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Freeman Davis
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Unknown Deputy U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ward v. United States Marshal Service
as 2:2011cv03053
Plaintiff:
Jason Mitchell Ward
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
