Cases 81 - 90 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haj-Hamed v. Rushing et al
as 4:2009cv02668
Defendant:
Henri L. Wedell, Warden Roddie Rushing, Thurgood Marshall, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ghassan Haj-Hamed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John King, Jr., et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporat, et al
as 10-5676
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. KING, JR., By next friend, LaBryant King
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LABRYANT KING, as next friend for John H. King, Jy.
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, BANK OF AMERICA and others
Burch et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00440
Plaintiff:
Kristin L. Burch and Anthony Burch
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Bayer Healthcare, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Thomas et al
as 4:2010mj30134
Defendant:
Lawrence D Thomas and Angelina N Burch
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Banks #05711-068 v. Burch et al
as 1:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks #05711-068
Defendant:
Katina Burch, Keith Everett, Unknown Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
John H. King
Defendant:
Countrywide Financial Corporation , Countrywide Home Loans , Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Banks and Banking
USA v. Eric Burch, Jr.
as 10-1202
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIC JOHN-JAMARION BURCH, JR.
Ghaith v. Rauschenberger et al
as 2:2009cv14336
Plaintiff:
Fawaz Ghaith
Defendant:
Don Rauschenberger, Jr, Don Rauschenberger, Jr, Marion Breasbois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
