Cases 81 - 90 of 252
Douglas et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11287
Plaintiff:
Willie Douglas , Etta Douglas , Charles Shehee and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , City of Flint , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gills et al v. Vandiver et al
as 2:2018cv02193
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Gills and Joey D Gills
Defendant:
James P Vandiver and Drew Foams Companies, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill Holding Company, Inc. v. Summit Partners Credit Advisors, L.P.
as 1:2018cv00316
Plaintiff:
Gill Holding Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Summit Partners Credit Advisors, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Quintana et al
as 5:2018cv00168
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Brown
Defendant:
Francisco Quintana, Robert Williams, Francisco Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Gill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gill Industries, Inc. v. REI Automation, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00106
Plaintiff:
Gill Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
REI Automation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gill Holding Company, Inc. v. Davis Capital Advisors, LLC
as 1:2017cv01079
Plaintiff:
Gill Holding Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Davis Capital Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2017cv02866
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Deanne B. Saltzman, Cindy Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 5:2017cv00154
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gill
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richard Stein v. D. Gill, et al
as 17-1871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DEAN STEIN
Defendant - Appellee:
D. GILL, Corrections Officer, L. MAKI, 034 Hearing Officer, S. RAYMOND, Hearing Investigator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
