Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 5,991
Carol Roth v. Adam Rogers
as 24-5533
Petitioner: CAROL ROTH
Respondent: ADAM P. ROGERS, Director of Industry Operations, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives
Alan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00953
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, FCI Elkton, Medical Doctor and others
Plaintiff: David P. Alan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. McNevin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00957
Plaintiff: Jermeal G. White
Defendant: Lieutenant P. McNevin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gee #792888 v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Defendant: P. Hubble, Unknown Naeyart, Keith Barber and others
Plaintiff: TyJuan Gee #792888
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Redwood et al
as 1:2024cv00306
Defendant: Kelly Storm, Dr. Aradhana Gill, R. Hale and others
Plaintiff: James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Defendant: DARSHAN KARWAT, POLARIS STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, MARCUS LEHMANN and others
Plaintiff: GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Schoettle v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00557
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Plaintiff: John P. Schoettle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02386
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wade v. Michigan, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv11402
Defendant: Leo P. Carey, Anthony F. Lubkin, Swanson and others
Plaintiff: Quan D. Wade
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
USA v. Timothy Rembert-Scroggins
as 24-1455
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TIMOTHY P. REMBERT-SCROGGINS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?