Cases 1 - 10 of 546
Pierce v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02612
Plaintiff:
Barbara Pierce
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pierce #211005 v. Snow et al
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Perry Pierce #211005
Defendant:
Unknown Snow, D. Baker and Unknown Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce et al v. Fehr et al
as 2:2024cv10968
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Pierce and Andre D. Modisett
Defendant:
Jacob Fehr and IFS International Freight Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Pierce v. Schwebel Baking Company et al.
as 4:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Marcus Pierce
Defendant:
Schwebel Baking Company and Local 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Union
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner:
James Eugene Pierce
Respondent:
Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jones
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Shawn McKenzie, Judy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arciaga v. Gulf Harbor Investment Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv02162
Plaintiff:
Emilita T. Arciaga
Defendant:
Gulf Harbor Investment Corporation and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Pierce v. Detroit Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv10604
Plaintiff:
Lori Pierce
Defendant:
Detroit Police Department, Charles Fitzgerald, Scott Barrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sari v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc
as 4:2024cv10574
Defendant:
Lennita Sari and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
