Cases 1 - 10 of 1,757
Ricky Todd v. City of Memphis, TN, et al
as 24-5572
Plaintiff:
RICKY TODD
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, TN, SAMUEL VOLLER, individually and in his official capacity as Police Officer of the City of Memphis Police Department and W. FRENCH, individually and in his official capacity as Police Officer of the City of Memphis Police Department
Arnold v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Connie L Arnold
Defendant:
Centurion of Tennessee, LLC, Shawn Phillips, Brett Cobble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rudd v. Mays et al
as 2:2024cv02400
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Latanua K. Rudd
Defendant:
Mays H. Samuel, JR., State of Tennessee and Tennessee Bar Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thomas KuhlIn re: Thomas Kuhl
as 24-1506
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS BENJAMIN KUHL, Uncle and Next Friend of Samuel Alexander Kuhl
Eric Newton, Jr. v. Tom Watson
as 24-3485
Petitioner:
ERIC SAMUEL NEWTON, JR.
Respondent:
TOM WATSON, Warden, North Central Correctional Institution
Stein v. Howell et al
as 3:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Samuel Stein
Defendant:
Officer Rodney N Howell, Officer Ashley Henschen, Officer Alec Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Profit #389088 v. Rasmussen et al
as 1:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bernard Profit #389088
Defendant:
Unknown Rasmussen, Unknown Johnson, Michael Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bush #576866 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bush #576866
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, John Davids, Unknown Vonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
